Amarok 2.1 Quick(-ish) Review

June 16th, 2009 | Categories: KDE, Random Raves | Tags:

So I’ve just installed Amarok 2.1. Configured my collection location easy enough, downloaded the alarm script from the scripts library (haven’t tried it yet) and now I set about making it look how I want. I know exactly how I want Amarok 2 to look: Exactly like Amarok 1.4.

I like my spreadsheet layout. It works perfectly for music management. I skipped 2.0 because it had no spreadsheet layout and we were promised it in 2.1. Except it isn’t there. You’re still forced into the 3 pane layout that tries to shove everything the world knows about the currently playing track down your throat.

I almost got rid of the 3 pane layout. When the left pane (collection / playlists / etc) is hidden, you can drag the splitter bar all the way to the left and the “now playing” pane disappears. Then I opened the collection pane again. *poof* The “now playing” pane rears its ugly head again.

I hope this is a bug, and that it’ll be fixed in the next update, but at this point I wouldn’t bet my life on it.

I then went to the playlists to set up the same dynamic playlists I have in Amarok 1.4 (”Everything” and several label-based lists that I switch between depending on my mood). While looking around, I did something which made Amarok very angry (whoring the CPU) and froze the UI. This is 2009 people: USE ANOTHER THREAD AND INFORM ME WHAT YOU’RE DOING!

After several long minutes, Amarok finally came back to life and I continue my investigations. There’s no “entire collection” playlist. There’s no label based dynamic playlists. What we have instead is some weird bias stuff I don’t understand (and have no inclination to learn).

On a hunch, I get a track into the playlist and get into the “Edit track details” window. There is no labels tab. I check the other tabs. There are no labels. Well done devs. Another useful feature dropped.

So I won’t be moving my main desktop to Amarok 2 yet, because yet again the KDE developers have delivered something that’s half finished and missing useful features which were there in previous incarnations. To me it seems they’ve gone all gooey-eyed over how shiny it looks without a care in the world that people actually want some functionality out of it.

I really wish I had the time to fork some of these projects (or rebuild them from scratch) and do it right. Amarok joins the KDE desktop on the list of projects I’d fork if I had time, both for the same reasons: OOOOHHHHHHH SHINY! What? You want to actually use our application? You don’t need to use it! Just sit back and enjoy the SHINY!

Edit: All posts which recommend any media player which doesn’t have label-based dynamic playlist support will be deleted. This is the one key feature that I love about Amarok 1.4 and I won’t be moving to any media player that doesn’t have it.

  1. Mirko
    June 16th, 2009 at 22:22
    Reply | Quote | #1

    I totally agree with your opinion on Amarok – devs tried to re-invent a wheel and – surprise, surprise, failed miserably. I’m sticking with Amarok 1.4 up until Amarok 2 regains all the functionality and useful layout.

    If it doesn’t I’ll have to find an alternative.

    I do have to disagree with you on KDE 4 though. I’m currently running the second beta of 4.3 and it’s quite impressive.

  2. lefty.crupps
    June 16th, 2009 at 22:50
    Reply | Quote | #2

    > So I won’t be moving my main desktop to Amarok 2 yet,
    > because yet again the KDE developers have delivered
    > something that’s half finished and missing useful
    > features which were there in previous incarnations.

    Amarok uses KDE but I don’t think its officially a KDE application. Regardless, both the KDE4 series and the Amarok2 series are nearly-complete rewrites of the software. It took KDE many years for KDE 3.5 to become what it was; 4.2.4 seems pretty close at this point in a lot less time, and with similar functionality, and with a lot more possibilities in its future. Amarok2 also has a more stable, fast, and improved code base. I also dislike the middle pane, but over all its drop in functionality seems pretty minimal to me. Except the playlist part, which isn’t there yet for me either.

    If you don’t like to get stuff done, there is always GNOME to try out ;)

  3. akau
    June 17th, 2009 at 13:16
    Reply | Quote | #3

    Yeha, I understand the frustration. KDE 4 is really still in preview release mode. BTW Amarok is officially part of the KDE project. They are getting there but even Amarok tells you that it’s a preview release.